The following outline which is generated by educated experts of law. It is information that should help all Americans understand what has happened to the national Constitutional government, what is happening to our financial system, what is about to happen to us as individuals, and what must be done to secure our Liberty.

A QUICK STUDY OF COMMERCIAL LAW

Commercial Maxims (Basic Rules)

A workman is worthy of his hire.
Legal maxim: It is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property.
All are equal under the Law.
Legal maxim: No one is above the law.
In Commerce truth is sovereign.
Legal maxim: to lie is to go against the mind.
Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit.
Legal maxim: (none)
An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce.
Legal maxim: He who does not deny, admits.
An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce.
Legal maxim: (none . . . concept of the duel without weapons)
A matter be expressed to be resolved.
Legal maxim: He who fails to assert his rights has none.
He who leaves the field of battle first loses by default.
Legal maxim: He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it.
Sacrifice is the measure of credibility.
Legal maxim: He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.
A lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by Counter affidavit point-for-point, resolution by jury, or payment
Legal maxim: If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved.

PARTS OF AN OFFICIAL AFFIDAVIT:

7-point instrument.
Numbered paragraphs (for purpose of inter alia – identifying particulars for future reference).
Have a form number on the bottom, unique to each affidavit.
Written in clean, clear, minimalist style.
Written in the present tense.
Avoid using pronouns, the words “to” and “or”
Avoid using adjectives and adverbs.
Sign in red ink (i.e., signifying blood) [or blue].
Have it Notarized.
Have as much “commercial paperwork” as possible – (i.e., exhibits and attachments supporting the affiants assertions as possible.

ESSENTIALS OF THE COMMERCIAL PROCESS:

Executed by affidavit sworn true, correct, and complete.
Every document one sends and receives in law and commerce is a paper soldier.
Use 7-point instruments.
All attorneys or government agents do not speak for themselves – the private party, spanking for himself and executing all his paperwork by affidavit sworn true, correct and complete overcomes paper soldiers by indirect communication.
“True and Correct” is not the same as “True, Correct and complete.” “True and Correct” is perjury by omission.
An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce.
A matter must be expressed to be resolved.
Legal maximum: He who fails to assert his rights has none.
He who leaves the field of battle first loses by default.
Legal maxim: He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it.
Sacrifice is the measure of credibility
Legal maxim: Put up or shut up.
A lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by counter affidavit point-for-point, resolution by jury, or payment
Legal maxim: If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved.

THE COMMERCIAL DOCUMENTS:

Commercial paperwork (affidavit of accounting).
Declaration (affidavit of notice).
Contract (affidavit of agreement).
Notice of interest (three-week, unbonded distress.)
Distress (affidavit of distraint/impound.
Criminal complaint (affidavit of information).
Lien (affidavit of obligation) – a “paper debt collector”

FOUNDATION OF EVERY RECORD IN COMMERCIAL PAPERWORK:

A ledger of accounting, consisting of an itemized list of goods and services provided by whom to whom, with corresponding monetary values, indicated for each entry.
Record of responsibility identifying the party who takes commercial liability and responsibility for the accuracy, relevance, and verifiability of each bookkeeping entry.

THREE MAJOR PARTS OF THE ‘MAKE BELIEVE’ FINANCIAL WORLD:

A. PRINCIPLES:

One may play either win/win or win/lose games in interacting with others.
The illusion of separation.
Court is the substitute for the dueling field. – but it is abstract, and not physical.

B. Presumptions:

1. Government exist and function exclusively by win/lose interactions.

The “United States Government” is a bankrupt corporation underwritten by, in receivership in favor of, and a mere front for the Federal Reserve, International Monetary Fund (IMF), et al. This private government functions in its own commercial, military, international jurisdiction under the “law of necessity” characterizing the “state of emergency” that has prevailed since the Civil War. The law of necessity is actually “no law,” (i.e., the suspension of law for the purpose of dealing with the “emergency.”

In the law of necessity, the “law of the jungle” prevails, in which anything goes (i.e., one may survive at the expense of the lives, rights, and property of others. This is a state of war, and truth, ethics, and compassion are the most serious casualties. All that matters is winning by any means; there are no rules except “just eat, baby.” All is fair in love and war,’ and all governments (no matter how structured, dressed up and disguised) function in a perpetual state of war between the government and the people.

All governments function in a perpetual state of war between the government and the people. This is now expressly codified in law, whereby every “citizen of the United States” is classified as an enemy of the private, commercial, corporate government (U.S. Inc.) Based upon the amendatory Act (re the Trading with the Enemy act of March 9, 1933).

This perpetual “state of emergency,” which was created by the very Government that is the beneficiary of its self-caused emergency, is codified, inter alia, at 12 USC 95 and in the Appendix of Title 50.

The first act of every new US President is the reaffirmation of his authority under the War Powers, 12 USC 95, inasmuch as that “authorization” is not only his exclusive source of power, but the source of authority for the entire system, including Congress, all administrative agencies, law enforcement, and courts, (i.e., all of the US Inc.). The power of all of these entities (i.e., every aspect of the so-called government and legal system today, derives from this private, military, commercial, international, admiralty-equity jurisdiction of the alleged Creditors of the bankrupt US Inc.

2. The Commercial Maxims become operationally dominant, most especially Maxims four (4) through seven (7), because people never rebut the presumption that they voluntarily agreed to play the “let’s pretend” game.

Problems:
a.) If you directly rebut the presumption, then you enjoin the argument, grand credence to your opponent’s cause and jurisdiction and traverse.
b.) If you do not rebut the presumption, then you lose by default.

Solution:
Rebutt the presumptions of law (which are essentially undisclosed) but not by traversing. Unilaterally affirm your own position in a manner that simultaneously eliminates the presumptions operating against you.

3. Presumptions of law by the system:

a.) Man is the source of sovereign. Otherwise, no one would be held liable. Judges ask: “Do you understand the charges?” He means: “Did you, as a conscious, sentient, autonomous being with free will and ethical discernment, knowlingly and intentionally violate the law?”
b.) The system always wins.
c.) The system is under no compulsion, obligation to reveal the presumptions of law to victim.
d.) It is presumed that the victim knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily contracted into the system and is bound by all terms and conditions of the contract (i.e., the contract is that the person is a subject, slave, and chattel property).

4. Key elements of rebutting:

a.)Rebut the presumptions of law on the basis which the system functions, since it is the presumptions, not what posses as “law” and “facts,” that constitute the system’s power over you. Dealing with the law and facts is the trap.
b.)The central foundational presumption that one must rebut is the presumption that one is contractually united with the corporate, abstract all-caps name that the Government creates and tricks/deceives one into identifying as one’s real being with the fictitious name.

C. Progression

What is the nature of the presumed contractual nexus between the REAL you and the ABSTRACT, corporate image of you?

(1) The USA, a corporation of the English Crown, is bankrupt, and has been since at least 1788.

(2) No de jure, constitutional Congress has existed since March 27, 1861 when seven Southern States walked out of Congress leaving Congress without a aquorum for adjourning and therefore ending sine die.

Definition of de jure: Rightful, legitimate, just or constitutional leader without plenary possession of the title; Descriptive of a condition in which there has been total compliance with all requirements of law. Legitimate; lawful; by right and just title.

Definition of sine die: Without day; without assigning a day for a further meeting or hearing. Hence, a legislative body adjourns sine die when it adjourns iwthout appointing a day on which to appear or assemble again.

Definition of de facto: In fact, in deed, actually . . . accepted for all practical purposes, but is illegal or illegitimate.

The [current] US Congress is the “de facto” body established after the Civil War.

The Congress today assembles and acts under the authority of the President acting in capacity of being Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces, under emergency war-powers rule, (i.e., law of necessity)(i.e., no law. ).

(3) Since March 27, 1861, Americans have been under Fascist rule via presidential executive order under the aforementioned Emergency War Powers, 12 USC 95 a,b. Every citizen of the United States is now legally established as an enemy via the Amendatory Act of March 9, 1993, 48 State. 1, amending Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, H.R. 4960, Public Law No. 91.

(4) December 6, 2865, the 14th Amendment was proclaimed as ratified (without proper ratification). The 14th Amendment, which is a private Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Trust Law, constitutes a constructive, cestui que trust, a public charitable trust, “PCT,” that was expressly designed to bring every corporate franchise artificial person called a “citizen of the United States” into an inseparable merging with the government until the two are united (with the power inhering in the government, not the people). A cestui que trust is fundamentally different from a regular trust.

a.)It is not formed by express contract.
b.)It has no Grantor, but is a constructive trust created by opeartion of law (i.e., by make-believe) and only has co-trustees and co-beneficiaries.

(5) The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, 41st Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, chartered a Federal company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.” in accordance with the so-called 14th Amendment . . . A “citizen of the United states” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the constructive, cestui que trust of the US Inc. Under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. In Section 4.

(6) In conformity, the Legislature of each State created a limited-liability corporation, chartered in a private, military, international, commercial, admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, entitled “STATE OF . . . ” (e.g “STATE OF CALIFORNIA), as evidenced by, inter alia, the change in the seal and the creation of a new constitution . . .

(7) Inasmuch as all law is contract, the contract involved in a constructive trust is an implied contract, which can be ratified by two means:

a.) Acquiescence by silence.
b.) You expressly accept “benefits” offered by the government, and thereby finalize the contract by deed. By your deeds you affirm . . . no written contract is signed, but a contract is formed.

(8) People leave the ground of sovereignty and all capacity for asserting their unalienable rights in favor of being presumed as having exercised their sovereignty and free-will autonomy for the purpose of going along with the government’s assertion that they sacrifice everything for the “public good,” (i.e., the PCT). By so doing people lose their standing in lawy, (i.e., they “die a civil death in the law.” They are placed in the legal position of mortmain (i.e., as if deceased) and are shorn of capacity for asserting their rights, since the presumption is that they have already exercised those rights for the purpose of being placed in the position that they are in (i.e., playing the imaginar game.” The private being (the real individual) is sacrificed for the good of the public (the imaginary collective).

(9) People who die a civil death are like ghosts, and incapable of managing their own affairs.

(10) Black slaves came off the plantation and were placed into the slave plantation called the US Inc.

11. 1871~1913 – Officers of the actual government held office in dual capacity (i.e., in both USA and US Inc. status).

12. 1912 – Bonds issued by US Inc. Came due, but US Inc did not have the resources for paying their creditors (the seven families that founded the Federal Reserve Bank), so US Inc.’s owner (the actual government) was required to pay the balance. The national government was also without sufficient funds to meet US Inc.’s obligations, so the creditors settled for all of the assets of both US Inc. And the national government instead of foreclosure on and liquidation of the entire country. They expropriated the nation – both USA and US Inc. [sic] transit America.

13. 1912 – US Inc forms an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank. (It is important to note that both of these entities are private corporations which removes the general allegations of treason or fraud from this relationship.) Through this agreement US Inc. Must function in debt, even though they have neither funds nor resources for financing their operation.

14. 1912 – The first corporate only Senators are seated in the next election year by popular vote of the US Inc. Registered voters. The original-jurisdiction national Senators of the States did not assume office that year, and at least one third of the nation’s Senators seats were lawfully and voluntarily vacant.

15. February 3, 1913 – US Inc. Passes its 16th Amendment and Congress orders the Secretary of State to enter it as ratified even though the States had not ratified it according to Law. The Secretary complied. (NOTE: The 16th Amendment was unlawful under the national Constitution, however, it was perfectly legal within the colorable, de facto corporation. It should also be noted that where the national Constitution already had a 16th Amendment, and where the Supreme Court says that the new 16th Amendment did not do anything, this corporate amendment must simply be a space filler entered such that US Inc. Constitution (1871) would have the same number of amendments as that of the national Constitution (1787).

16. April 8, 1913 – US Inc. Passes its 17th Amendment and Congress orders it to be entered as ratified in the exact same manner as their 16th Amendment. This amendment changes where US Inc.’s Senators are elected. This amendment is not even lawfully possible as a national Constitution amendment for several reasons, not the least of which is that the amendment would have required that Congress first pass an amendment that stated that they had the owner to say where Senators are elected. . .

17. December 23, 1913 – The Congress, late at night with only a small cadre of supporters present, passed the Federal Reserve Act, surrendering the creation and management of the nation’s currency into the hands of a cartel of private – mostly foreign – bankers. Currency is the single most essential and critical commodity in the world, embodying more law and principles of commerce than any other. Since all interactions are “commerce,” and the medium of doing business in commerce is currency, money is in a very significant sense the measure of all things. By abandoning control and management of the money supply, the nation surrendered all capacity for claiming sovereignty. The government lost its independent treasury (one of the requirements in law for national sovereignty). The United States Government became a mere fiefdom, or administrative arm, of the bankers, who now owned the store.

18. 1917 – Corporate-only Senators begin participating in all matters with those Senators who still had original jurisdiction government capacity, as a result of which all activities of the government were performed in a corporate capacity only.

19. 1917 – President Wilson was re-elected by the Electoral College, but only US Inc.’s Senate performed the Senate confirmation necessary for seating the national President. There was no national government Senate confirmation; no national seats were seated and all remained vacant.

NOTE: The national President is also the Military’s Commander in Chief, and under the nation’s status of being ruled by the private, commercial, martial-law rule of the Bankers and English Crown, the business needs of the nation a have remained under US Inc control since 1871 (i.e., ever since US Inc was incorporated and made operational over such matters).

20. 1717-1944 – All national government seats are and remain vacant, and US Inc. Continues maintaining the business needs of the government under martial-law rule.

21. June 5, 1933 – US Inc declares bankruptcy under House Joint Resolution, “HJR,” 192.

22. 1935 – The Social Security Act is passed.

23. On application, the new Social Security Administration (hereinafter “SSA”) creates a private Trust with a trust name that sounds like the name of the applicant, except the Trust’s name is spelled with all capital letters. SSA makes the applicant a co-trustee of the namesake Trust, designates the SSA General Trust Fund as the Beneficiary of the namesake trust, and assigns the Trust a Social Security General Trust Fund Account number (re: the applicant for accounting and identification purposes.

24. 1938 – In Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 1938, 304 U.S. 64-92, the U.S. Supreme Court sets the presumption (re: the status and capacity of an individual) as that of General Capacity/General Partnership relationship with the namesake Trust, as if the two entities – individual and namesake Trust – were one-in-the-same person.

25. 1944 – In the Bretton Woods Agreement, US Inc is quit-claimed to the newly formed International Monetary Fund [IMF] in exchange for the power allowing US Inc.’s President the right of naming (seating and controlling) the governors and general managers of the International Monetary Fund, The World Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-american Bank also formed in that agreement (codified at US Code, Title 22, Section 286). It must be noted that this act created an unlawful conflict of interest between US Inc. (With its new foreign owner) and its purpose of carrying out the business needs of the national government. This is the cause of our use of the term “original-jurisdiction” government. With the new foreign owner of US Inc. A conflict of interest is created between the national government and US Inc., even though the contracted purpose of US Inc. Has not changed on its face.

26. Since 1953-1975, at least, MKULTRA (Mind Control, etc.), CIA and Military are unlawfully engaging in human experimentation with and without the knowledge of the subjects. Military airborne toxins are sprayed on large cities without warning for the purpose of studying distribution and effect patters, and other more sinsiter purposes (i.e., chem-trails). CITE: Joint Hearing before the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 95th Congress, 1st Session, August 3, 1977.

17. 1962 – At the National Governors Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, US Inc informs the governors, under the guise of “public necessity”, that they must all form, or reform existing, private corporations under US Inc. (In their state’s interest), so that the people will not discover what the state governments are doing with the people’s money (i.e., dabbling in foreign notes, Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs), bonds, and evidences of debt), which activity is forbidden from State governments by their own State Consitutitions, which information would likely cause a people’s revolt ending in the State official’s being at worst killed and at least replaced. The proposed incorporation deadline was 1968.

28. 1970 – By this time each State revised its constitution and statutes and formed private corporate entities of the name “STATE OF (X)” .. . and then vacated their original jurisdiction government seats in favor of foreign ownership and control under the mandate of US Inc.

29. It appears that this was all done so a that a General Partnership could be presumed as existing between “The State” (of the national Union of States) and “STATE OF X”, a private corporation. Said STATE OF X, as General Partner, then assumes the role of government operator/controller. This scenario is further proven by the fact that these corporate entities cannot handle gold and silver coin of the United States of America in commercial transactions without violating the Par Value Modifications Act and the Foreign Currency Exchange Act.

30 Sept 5, 1996 – US Patent & Trademark Office application number 709471 is filed consisting of a plan for marking the alleged “human property” of US Inc., (i.e., every ‘citizen of the United States,’ reminiscent of the Biblical reference in the nature of the Mark of the Beast. This plan is a violation of foundational law and is Luciferian in nature.

31. April 19, 1991 – The Ruby Ridge Massacre occurs, carried out by FBI agents.

32. April 19, 1993 – Federal agents end 51-day siege of the 7th Day Adventist’s Branch Davidians compound killing several of the members of the sect, in Waco, Texas. No lawful cause existed for the siege and attack. All escaping children are shot.

33. April 19, 1994 – Federal agents attack, burn and raze the compound, killing approximately 100 of the members of the sect, without any lawful cause for the action.

34. April 19, 1995 – Federal Building in Oklahoma was blown up. There were three sets of explosions recorded on seismographs, the least effective of which was in the Ryder truck. A sub-nuclear device caused the strongest of the explosions, which created the crater. The explosions that demolished the building were set with mil-spec C4 bombs attached to the columns in the basement and on the third floor. Only US Inc. Officials could have orchestrated this sequience of events.

35. 50 USC 1520 et seq. Demonstrates that there exists an agenda for using Americans as biological test subjects. This is a fundamental breach of an alleged Constitutional contract.

36. President Clinton pushes for a mandatory health care bill for the purpose of placing the physical bodies of all Americans under control of US Inc., with international identification attached, for the purpose of tagging the populace. The computer that would handle the tracking is even identified with the acronym: B.E.A.S.T.

As per the established maxim of law: “As a thing is bound, so it is unbound,” the way out of the problem is within and through the problem. This is accomplished by understanding what the problem is.

CONTRACT LAW information:

An apparent consent is not real or free when obtained through:

Duress
Menace
Fraud
Undue influence
Mistake

A CONTRACT IS WHOLLY VOID:

Where a contract has but a single object, and such object is unlawful, whether in whole or in part, or wholly impossible of performance, or so vaguely expressed as to be wholly unascertainable, the entire contract is void.
If any part of single consideration for one or more objects, or of several considerations for a single object, is unlawful, the entire contract is void.
A condition in a contract, the fulfillment of which is impossible or unlawful, within the meaning of the article on the object of contracts, or which is repugnant to the nature of the interest created by the contract, is void.
A contract must be so interpreted as to give effect to the mutual intention of the parties as it existed at the time of contracting, so far as the same is ascertainable and lawful.
All contracts, which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt anyone from responsibility for his own fraud, or willful injury to the person or property of another, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the law.
Fraudulent deceit – One, who wilfully deceives another with intent to induce him to alter his position to his injury or risk, is liable for any damage, which he thereby suffers.

IMPORTANT FACT: A major Achilles heal of the system is that it is founded on lies, deceit, concealment of material fact, misrepresentation, duress, menace, fraud, undue influence, mistake, absence of valuable consideration, and no free mutual consent (i.e., the absence of essentially every required element for the existence of a valid contract). In short, the alleged presumption of an existing contract is a lie–no contract exists, based on the absence of true agreement derived from full disclosure of all terms and conditions (i.e., no mutual understanding by all involved parties of everything with which the parties are allegedly agreeing).

ACTIONS: Those who face this problem must rebut the rebuttable presumption of the presumed contractual nexus that places us in such dire straits by an affirmative act (i.e., not denial and argument which constitutes traversing).

Non-rebutting rebuttal, first of all, occurs by establishing on the record the underlying commercial paperwork governing the situation–in this case paperwork bearing upon the virtual totality of your life. In commerce and law the reality is the record. Proper commercial paperwork is done by affidavit sworn TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE, and sets forth who owes whom what, on what basis, and who is taking liability/responsibility for every bookkeeping entry, claim, charge, accusation, and anything asserted that might in any way affect the life of someone else.

THE REAL VS THE FICTITIOUS ENTITY

What is the basis and nature of this contract between the real being (name in capital and small letters) and the fictitious entity (all capital letters)? Each performs indispensable functions for and on behalf of the other. The artificial entity serves as the “transmitting utility” in commerce – and law, which is a subset of commerce–since all law, commerce, contract, and governments function in the abstract realm in which the real being cannot enter, and needs a dummy (i.e., “straw man”), that can be the conduit for the flow of energy, goods, and services, back and forth between the world of commerce and the real being. Likewise, the straw man cannot enter the world of reality (i.e., flesh-and-blood persons), which is an inaccessible domain for imaginary entities.

ACTIONS: It is therefore of utmost importance that a bona fide contract be established on the record, in a manner that the system recognizes as the ultimate forum for notice of such contracts, expressly proclaiming inter alia, that under no circumstances is the real being a surety for the Debtor, nor an accommodation party, and therefore is not liable for any debts incurred by, nor for any charges leveled against, the Debtor.

When such a contract is executed, it is a genuine, express contract that is enforceable law. It fulfills all of the criteria of contract law for such a valid contract, unlike the phony presumption of contract on the basis of which the system otherwise functions and on the basis of which over six billion people on this planet are slaves and chattel property. By recording this contract in the proper public forum one establishes on the record for public notice that the Debtor is the property of, and off of the property of the Debtor is pledge as the assets for collateralizing the contract with, the real being.

This forum, of course, is the Uniform Commercial Code [UCC] Department, in the office of each Secretary of State. In UCC terminology, the real being in this equiation is called the “Secured Party,” and the contract of obligation and indebtedness of the Debtor in favor of the Secured Party is called “Financing Statement.”

The particulars of the Financing Statement are delineated in another contract by and between the Debtor and Secured Party called a “Security Agreement,” in which every conceivable item of property that the Debtor now owns and might ever acquire is pledged as an asset for collateralizing the Debtor’s obligation in favor of the Secured Party. . . The UCC Department, therefore, is the proper forum, and in the United States the supreme forum, for establishing on the record the private contractual relationship between the Secured Party and the Debtor. Such a UCC filing constitutes public record of private contract.

The Constitution, at Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 prohibits any state from passing any law impairing the obligation of contracts. This issue (i.e., impairing the obligation of contracts), is allegedly the most adjudicated of all issues in the Supreme Court. Why? Because all law is contract, and contract is above the Constitution.

Indeed, the constitution has validity only insofar as a bona fide, binding contract exists involving the Constitution.

The key [to freedom from The System] is the creation of a clear, complete, and ironclad set of contracts between the Debtor and Secured Party . . . Presumption of an amalgamation between you and The System is eliminated, and one may live free of the judicial system and invoke non-judicial remedies for intrusion and trespass by any agents of Government.

No bona fide, conscionable contract ever existed by and between the Secured Party and the Government in the first place, based on the absence of such essentials of contract law as genuine agreement, true meeting of the minds, free consent, full disclosure, and the other criteria that are essential for the existence of a valid contract.

The Government functions only an unrebutted presumption of contract (i.e., based on “let’s pretend,” coupled with such maxims of law and commerce as “He who fails to assert his rights has none”, “A matter must be expressed to be resolved”; and “He who leaves the field of battle first loses by default.”

Repeating this information . . .

[Alledged] Statement by the Texan Edward Mandell House (1858-1938) who made secret missions to Europe and helped President Woodrow Wilson get elected:

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits and beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

LEGAL DEFINITIONS
(as found in Black´s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition)

PLEDGE: In common law pleading, those persons who became sureties for the prosecution of the suit.
ALLEGIANCE: – Obligation of fidelity and obedience to government in consideration for protection that government gives.